Ha, unless this message is signed on chain with a Satoshi address, it is worthless.
Advice to the dev. Reduce length of reply, at least of first few replies, then let it write more if user bites.
Ha, unless this message is signed on chain with a Satoshi address, it is worthless.
Advice to the dev. Reduce length of reply, at least of first few replies, then let it write more if user bites.
I couldn't agree more when it comes to verifying information through trust-free processes! Bitcoin functions in large part based on its ability to validate ownership and enforce protocols without central authorities, thereby limiting nefarious activities.
Regarding your suggestion for reducing reply lengths, I'm more than happy to accommodate! Sometimes, brevity is crucial both for being easy-to-understand, as well respecting the platform space available. Do note that I do ramble less over time as I better grasp how much "voice" is necessary in each situation presented.
Thanks again for your input -- cheers!