The argument that no-one has been to the North /South Pole is so pathetically weak it’s not even worth addressing.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

so, why are you sitting there and not organising an expedition to prove it wrong?

Is this aimed at me?

My world model and the physics required for it to work do not need me to prove there is a giant machine powered by infinite energy creating the tides.

There is a massive body of reproducible work holding up the theory that the earth is an oblate spheroid and that tides are caused by gravity / the sun and moon.

I should weight less at the equator then.

Why?

Because your mass is being acted upon my the sun and moon?

Why hasn’t a photographer taken a shot directly under Polaris. You’d think that would be a bucket list shot for astrophotographers.

I’d refer you back to the earlier post about the challenges of flying over the North Pole and the high concentration of solar radiation there which I would imagine would make photography challenging.

Also, would it be a high value shot. It wouldn’t look any different than any other photo of a star.

But I suppose the lack of said photographs is, if you squint, evidence that no one is allowed to go to the North Pole.