Replying to Avatar Sovereign Being

I can see it from that perspective, I have some friends who think the same way. I wouldn't say it's a minority position, but I think both are true to some extent.

At some point, it becomes to difficult to pretend that all of these things are organic, such as all governments agreeing to shut down their countries and enforce the same 'guidelines' unilaterally. The few leaders who didn't, mysteriously died.

The 'coincidences' only ever trend in the direction of the state. To me, its the same type of gaslighting (from state actors) as suggesting autism has solely gone up because of the way it is diagnosed. 'Experts are baffled. It may be red meat and racism.' type of nonsense.

Pfizer gave their own people shots from a different batch than what was given to everyone else. People aren't heroes, they are just looking out for themselves, and in doing so they remain complicit, knowingly or ignorantly.

"They" - the controllers, bankers, secret societies and elite families have been shaping the landscape forever. It is an incestuous revolving door between organizations, governmental and private, that all work against the people for themselves.

Most are not in on some secret plan, but they are still working within a system that perpetuates the narratives set forth by think-tanks. There is a hierarchy to policy planning and distribution, it can only be top-down. We know the organizations that set and distribute the policies. We know who the members of these things are. They openly brag about infiltrating governments.

Compliance is mandated at all levels in varying ways, but the policies come from those nearest the levers of control.

They react this way to resistance because it threatens them. We must be resisting at all times. It isn't futile, this is a continuous cycle that ebbs and flows throughout history. That is my perspective, of course. I'm not saying it is correct or that you should think the same, fwiw. It just makes sense to me.

"At some point, it becomes to difficult to pretend that all of these things are organic, such as all governments agreeing to shut down their countries and enforce the same 'guidelines' unilaterally. "

Having worked in a govt this is absolutly what I think. They had specific plans for pandemics (which I worked on). When they were clearly not going to fly they'll have looked around for any alternative, and there's none better than doing what everyone else was doing.

They were even explicit about this - eg saying we had to lock down because the rest of Europe was locking down. And they were right. It's herd logic.

The only thing that has changed to make covid etc far worse than previous panics is that the herd is now supercharged by phones. The waves of fear and anger are hugely more powerful.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

At that level I would say it is typically all organic - the 'useful idiots' I refer too. I guess I am doing a not-so-great job of trying to bring across a nuanced point, because I said, I don't think everyone is in on something.

Most people involved in government are not particularly wise; those people are usually spending their time doing other things in life.

The majority of people still believe there was a pandemic of natural origin to this day, because they don't care to consider anything else. There were obvious precursors to the pandemic and many reasons that it happened, and I don't believe any of them are of natural originals. The going direct BlackRock plan started in the months leading up to it, and the pandemic was the perfect cover-up to print money.

That was just one of many reasons. The other was an opportunity to seize more control over people. You think they are just saying, "There WILL be another pandemic." is just for fun? They are telling us over and over what they plan to do.

Many in government or any position of power became tyrannical, taking things too far like arresting people because they went for a walk. That is just normal useful idiot behaviour. I am in no way suggesting those people are 'in' on something. The vast majority of those people are not involved in any plans. How does one explain those who opposed covid (I think it was 5 of them) all dying under suspicious circumstances? It is something that is easy to dismiss when you don't consider the somewhat obvious explanation for it.

They had plans for pandemics, and instead they followed some completely novel ideas, which coincidentally happened to be the same as those outlined in 'preparedness' exercises but nothing like what they had originally planned for. They threw out all their plans and went with what everyone else was doing. It is a great demonstration for herd mentality - since none of what they did had any evidence backing it. It was all made up. That's how useless these people are, they still can't discern that TODAY. They still can't admit they fucked up, instead most of them double down.

I highly recommend checking this 20 min clip from Mike Benz. It is a breakdown of declassified documents of how governments infiltrate all sorts of movements with careful planning that seem so incredibly unlikely that people just can't comprehend it. These are planned, coordinated efforts that go above what most people are privy to. That is how they get away with it - using the useful idiots as cover, and compartmentalising the rest.

https://x.com/MikeBenzCyber/status/1825048993136546230

OK thanks will put that clip on my list to watch.

Do you happen to have an easy link about the "5 people who opposed it are dead"?

Haiti, Jovenel Moïse

Ivory Coast, Hamed Bakayoko

Swaziland, Ambrose Dlamini

Burundi, Pierre Nkurunziza

Tanzania, John Magufuli

"Magufuli tested a goat, papaya and oil amongst other things to show that these things were testing positive for covid and refused the vaccines."

Of course the state-owned fact-checkers were quick to publish debunks of these deaths, but the patterns are pretty clear.