Yeah I'll trust Western Wikipedia that accepts Western mainstream media as a valid source on China. 🫠
May the Tiananmen protest are not current enough. A very recent showcase on the stance of the Chinese state on free speech were the COVID-19 uprising: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_COVID-19_protests_in_China
Of this one there is too much footage, for that any number of people negating the fact that china is not accepting their people to speak up in public.
Discussion
Tell me your sources. Since the funny thing about trusting is this: Everyone trusts in something. But thos who can not name to whom they trust lost its freedom to choose.
I don't know what you expect. A list of news/reporting sources I consume? *The* source on Tiananmen? The latter: No idea. The first? I guess I could export you my bookmarks folder, but then what?
On tianmen for example. And for news as well. Would like to inspect those sources critically.
As I said: No idea. Too many sources. Some books, blog posts of people who were there. It’s been years since I last checked it out. Wikipedia is just propaganda bullshit on stuff like 9/11, COVID. If you think their takes on China are the exception, I’m not going to convince you otherwise.
Okay. Seems quiet obvious you have no idea how Wikipedia works. No government or person with money has any power over wikipedia. It is a structure of contributer, that have the say. So it is very hard to harden any claim on that there should be a tendency to protect some conspiracy or support any entity other then reality.
Lots of assumptions based on nothing. 🫠