What’s your best argument against the “the ability to put illegal content in inscriptions will increase the GOV’s ability to negatively impact bitcoin in the court of public opinion; thus allowing them to attack BTC on/off ramps, node runners, etc.”

Not trolling; seriously wondering 🙌

Trying be be open minded about it. Particularly because exploit wld have happened at some point. Always hard to argue against freedom of expression too, but it likely gets priced out, as many have suggested.

Seems like a lot of the participants simply move from chain to chain chasing cash-grabs / hype. No different to alts.

Artistic value appears v.weak at this point IMHO. Obviously speculation on the value of lower level entries.

Thats said, the volume tests the infrastructure and hardens it for the future.

Potentially a percentage might stay and perhaps even add something useful to the ecosystem.