Replying to Avatar theda

I used to not want kids, now they are my everything. 🥰 I don’t think you get the full life experience without them.
Avatar
RedTailHawk 1mo ago đź’¬ 1

Isaac Newton didn't have kids.

Nikola Tesla didn't have kids.

Immanuel Kant didn't have kids.

Jean-Paul Sartre didn't have kids.

Susan B. Anthony didn't have kids.

Rosa Parks didn't have kids.

Did they not get the full life experience?

Who will change the world more, those individuals, or some trailer park mom on food stamps with 7 babies and 7 baby daddies?

It's not a one size fits all thing. Libertarians and Austrian economists should really understand that, and I'm sure HODL does...he's just choosing to harbor cognitive dissonance because he seems to be in need of validation because he has a hole in his life he doesn't know how to fill.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
OceanSlim 1mo ago

The trailer park mom. If no one is here to see their discoveries then what's the point.

Avatar
FreedomTech 1mo ago đź’¬ 1

Your holding up Marxist Jean-Paul Sarte, and Emmanuel Kant, who's philosophical ideology is considred to be the basis for which Marxism is built on? You think those people did good for humanity? Are you nuts?

Should've know the person pushing back most against having kids is a teacher of the Marxist religion. This is what is in your schools people ... indoctrinating your kids with their religion that claims, "It's not Marxism, it's not a religion."

None of those people you mentioned had a full life experience.

It's your life, do what you want

That said, I highly recommend having kids. Adopt if you have to. You'll thank us later.

Avatar
RedTailHawk 1mo ago

First, Kant was NOT a Marxist.

Kant was notable for his contributions to the philosophy of ethics, namely deontology which is a valid lens through which to view events. Intent is part of the equation. It's not the whole equation but it is a part of it. That's why manslaughter is a different charge than homicide.

Sartre became a Marxist, that's true. Also, I never claimed to agree with his philosophy, so that's a strawman on your part. You're making ASSumptions.

Another strawman is stating that I'm against having children. That's not my position.

I'm saying that HODL's original claim, "Marriage and family is essential for a full and happy life", is a false claim.

Try again.

Avatar
AC 1mo ago

Idgaf if people have kids or not. Their decision. But I'd be rooting for bitcoiners to have kids, personally.

All that to say what I really came to say... What if that trailer park mom birthed Issac, Nikola, or Rosa? 🤔

Avatar
theda 1mo ago đź’¬ 1

No they did not. Just as I have not either because I haven’t been sky diving, to the North Pole, created inventions or a million other things.

Having kids is however, a life experience that will teach you lessons faster than anything else, in my opinion.

I’m not saying I am a superior human because of it, which it sounds like you are assuming.

And we would first need to establish parameters on how to measure “changing the world more” before deciding who changes the world more.

Sounds like you haven’t reproduced…yet. 🧡

Avatar
RedTailHawk 1mo ago

Happiness is subjective.

As a ridiculously obvious example, I present masochism for consideration.

I'm not a masochist but I know they exist and what makes them happy is the complete fucking opposite of what makes most people happy.

One size fits all is bullshit.