Thank you nostr:npub1r30l8j4vmppvq8w23umcyvd3vct4zmfpfkn4c7h2h057rmlfcrmq9xt9ma 🫂

Ideas to think about:

1) what would a decentralized Wikipedia look like?

2) why would anyone use this over a regular Wikipedia?

3) how can such a system leverage the affordances provided by Nostr?

4) can it be a place to help understand academic papers? how can we help remove barriers in academia? Can we address the ever increasing rate of papers being published, no doubt a growing portion will be published with the assistance of AI (covertly given the incentives of the current system) creating a diluted information landscape?

This framework of knowledge attempts to address some of these questions. Its super early, but I'm hopeful this can is a positive path forward.

By addressing these questions this framework no longer is just another Wikipedia, or just another note taking app. Its a framework for knowledge management, highly interoperable with use cases that span the range from personal knowledge management to full academic articles and then some

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

1st answer : Wouldn't look like Wikipedia

2nd answer: Because Wikipedia is riddled with bias .

Good points, on the money.