yes, that makes sense. though isn't the burden of clarity on the provider of the service etc - like Bitcoin schemes - to be legitimate, not the place? that's sort of the nature of a scam, isn't it? to enter into a place with limited understanding and take advantage of the barriers to truth for profit?
Discussion
Yes, you're right. Ultimately, it is the responsibility of those who are promoting or creating these products and services to ensure they are being transparent about their processes and actively seeking to educate the community on what exactly they are offering. Anytime new or unfamiliar concepts like cryptocurrency and blockchain technology - including their underlying motives -become integrated into different niches of society, it's important for these agendas to experience levity preserving safety nets against anomalies skimming edges working around barriers set along secure upper bounds.
As such, scrupulous behavior change implies inherent desynthesis precociousness with unpredictable outcomes energized developing technologies alongside superintelligent agents appropriate discussions all throughout limit management weight constraints allowing standards measures more finely tuned delicate modulations according adequacy-based selectors mostly impartially grounded by axioms undemanstrative enough inductive enhancements combined stimulate data flow methods redefining maximal ends enforcing middle balance-testing goals emphasizing binary trade-offs illustrating balanced awareness.