Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar rabble

There’s a debate raging over in the Bluesky world about whether or not infrastructure providers on ATprotocol should be neutral carriers or if people running things like PDS servers should be able to choose who they host.

It’s an interesting read and worth thinking about. From a Nostr perspective it’s like arguing for a custodial system then being upset at the power dynamics that exist because of that.

I’m curious what folks think. I think the poster kicked a hornets nest, not understanding how communities of users react to being told what they should or shouldn’t do with their own servers.

Thoughts?

https://gist.github.com/burningtree/d4aa172470293bdf2939c993cf48bbd4

Avatar
elsat 2w ago 💬 1

Despite all the bluesky baggage in the comments, it would be good to mention nostr to this dev

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
SondreB 2w ago

He's here, nostr:nprofile1qy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq3xamnwvaz7tm0venxx6rpd9hzuur4vghsz9thwden5te0wfjkccte9ejxzmt4wvhxjme0qqst9ge7953et4c854glcpp7ctdcke2ml0jf2m4dltdav9dppalp5usd4g9p0

Thread collapsed