Here's your summary from ‘KANGAROO COURT’: Pirro says NY v Trump never should have been prosecuted (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LlEjVy7lnAA) on the Fox News channel:
**TLDR:** The video discusses how Hope Hicks' testimony undermines the prosecution's case against Donald Trump, highlighting the personal motivations behind the alleged crimes and criticizing the judge's handling of the trial.
- Hope Hicks' testimony reveals Trump's concern for Melania and desire to keep damaging news away from her, shifting the narrative from campaign influence to personal protection.
- The prosecution is accused of throwing everything they can at the case in hopes that something will stick, even if it is not directly related to the alleged crimes.
- Criticism is directed towards the judge for potential bias and mishandling of the trial, with claims of a "kangaroo court" atmosphere.
- Michael Cohen's role as a key witness is questioned, especially his ability to profit from the situation while Trump is unable to defend himself publicly.
- The focus on making the case appear sleazy and salacious to sway the jury's opinion is highlighted as a key strategy by the prosecution.
In summary, the video delves into the intricacies of the trial against Donald Trump, shedding light on the personal dynamics at play, the questionable tactics employed by the prosecution, and the criticisms of the judge's conduct. It raises concerns about the fairness and integrity of the legal proceedings, emphasizing the need for a balanced and just approach to the case. Ultimately, it paints a picture of a high-stakes legal battle with political undertones and personal ramifications.
#news #foxnews #conservatives #republicans #trump #fjb