Can't imagine why you have a whopping 24 followers with asshole comments like this.

Anyways, we've figured out the source of the confusion.

wymike thinks I'm using the modified vs unmodified trials as my proof for this practice's legitimacy. That was an assumption because that's all he's seen.

There have been many other trials including blind trials, like me not knowing what to expect when I tested the 3 unmodified pyramids multiple times each and I got perfectly consistent results that violated my uneducated expectations. I wouldn't have expected them to test in a certain way given the proximity of Giza to Cairo so when I got the results I got, I looked it up and found the answer. The Great Pyramid has indentations. I didn't know that.

The point is that the odds were 1/729 that I went at least 6/6 on unmodified pyramid trials that were blind.