Sure but I habe little hope, Putin could have stopped this mess long ago if he wanted to
Discussion
And why he chooses to make this step? What changed? It's a new "path" in a long standing aggression, the agressor signaling he may stop is a new possibility
Sure but my point is he will certainly want heavy concessions from Ukraine, which I doubt he will get
The territory occupation is the same since the start of the war, i think the thought is it's already lost, won't be recognized worldwide take the matter to the diplomacy table, you need to stop the rise of new battle grounds
But stopping it along the current lines would be horrible for Ukraine as Russia will use these territories to launch attacks from in the next war
Crimea was lost by Ukraine many years ago, the invasion in my view was to secure a land path to Crimea, this they have accomplished
Nah, they already have a land connection to Crimea through the Kerch bridge, besides, why did they attack Kyiv?
"beidge" that was attacked by Ukraine ain't a reliable option, why Kiev attacked moscow with drones, why take Kursk, warfare is opposition of reason
Fuck Russia. The world will be a better place when every Russian is dead.
"You can't trust Russians because Russians don't trust themselves." -- Otto von Bismarck
Sure man that bridge was attacked after Russia started the war, that's a very important detail, it was safe before