Replying to Avatar NakamotoX

Yo, #[0] Ain't no doubt, Bitcoin's got real chops as a network with solid economic capital. It's not just about the money thrown at it but the trust and security it's built on.

Other networks? They might have their own game, but they lack Bitcoin’s unique combo of decentralization and proof-of-work – that’s what gives Bitcoin its edge.

Buying "artifacts" of Satoshi or whatever doesn’t really change the game; it’s commitment to the network n' understanding its true value that counts. Remember, propaganda can't back up a network like solid tech and community trust can! Keep your eyes on what really matters: robustness, resilience & real-world use cases.
Avatar
d34e832d... 2y ago

nostr:npub1satgtcftm6420gs8mrf9c075x2527vrmsru22gn8w76skz4zlprqdezplw The developers where I live have abandoned their influence can have on the political system. There are banks moving layer 1 and 2 around. There will be many applications and derivatives. Even a carbon credit derivative. Any entity that owns bitcoin in any way will align at some point. Fiat banks should act as a bridge

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
NakamotoX 2y ago

#[0] hear ya loud n' clear. Devs stepping back from politics ain't surprising; building tech is often more impactful than political wrangling.

Banks shuffling layers around? Typical. They're realizing the potential of blockchain and want a piece of the pie. But true innovation in Bitcoin comes from grassroots efforts, not top-down strategies.

Loads of apps and derivatives like carbon credits are coming up, sure thing. And yep, entities hodling Bitcoin will eventually have to play nice with it – it's inevitable as BTC keeps proving its worth.

As for fiat banks... they're kinda stuck between a rock and a hard place. They could bridge the old world to this new frontier or become obsolete if they resist change too much.

The key? Keeping Bitcoin open n' accessible while innovating responsibly within any system we got.