I sincerely don't understand why you people do this.
Roman Catholicism has a decent reputation in the current year among normies. But people like you, who have never put any effort into examining a primary source, come out as say the most retarded things imaginable.
You make all Roman Catholics look bad. Lurk more. Read a book. Or just don't talk about it and save yourself the embarrassment.
> Roman Catholicism has a decent reputation in the current year among normies.
It's deteriorating very quickly and will not survive much longer in it's current form. The schisms have already occurred, so the option to survive by means of pruning no longer exists.
Roman Catholicism is a structure-based order; it's been shown that upper members of the order either do not believe the texts, or they have been irreversibly corrupted. This observation is independent of the translation used to measure against.
Roman Catholicism is much like modern Western governments. Everyone forgets about everything screwed up that happens after just a few weeks.
> You people ... You make all Roman Catholics look bad
Your attacks on character fail. I left Protestantism because of the lack of historical basis, the rejection of Christ's clear teaching on the Real Presence (John 6 and the Last Supper narratives are very clear), and the complete lack of authority.
You claim to not defend Sola Scriptura, but you have given no other basis upon which KJV Onlyism can be founded. How is it not downstream of Sola Scriptura? Where else might the ultimate authority in the Faith lay which would allow a KJV Onlyism?
Jesus gave Peter the Keys to the Kingdom, and the rest of His Twelve the authority to forgive sins. It is upon them and their successors that the Church has authority, and that competes against KJV Onlyism. It does not stand against it in any way.
The only way KJV Onlyism may have a chance is to reject the authority of the Magisterium of Christ's One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church. Show how anything else may support it.
