There’s no value in being 1 in 2K on one particular obscure feed that’s useful mostly to serious curators looking to be the guides (DJs so to speak) of the protocol.
And yes, it makes the enormous problem (curating the entire protocol) manageable for those who are up for the task and pushes it onto them.
> There’s no value in being 1 in 2K on one particular obscure feed that’s useful mostly to serious curators.
I disagree. The more the "guides" of the curators are used, the more value can be extracted by influencing curators.
If the curator is any good, he won’t be sharing most of the posts. So if you’re posting garbage just to get into the feed, it won’t bear fruit. And if you’re posting quality things, it will, and then it’s not a problem.
it's quite bizarre that nobody thinks that simply people talking to each other for work and play reasons and paying for the infrastructure and development through subscriptions is enough
no, we gotta have all that money sloshing around like advertisers were hiding in the shadows flinging it at everyone who gets an audience
