There's no ad hominem because I'm not making any logical argument.
I'm making a SUBJECTIVE characterization of piling a much of common bitcoin twitter ghospel together as potentially cultist.
It's a personal opinion, not an argument. I'm sorry if it ofends you. You are obviously entitled to disagree.
So with you its your feelings over objective truth.
I dont care how you feel. Your feelings are none of my business.
I deal with the facts of the matter.
If you didn't care about my opinion you could have just ignored me and moved on.
In my original comment I explicitly said I don't disagree with any of your points in particular.
Your Logic: Replying to you comment means I care what you have to say.
Incorrect: I get personal satisfaction exposing the contradictions of the arguments you made. Thank you for that.
What contradictions did you expose?
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed
Thread collapsed