i respect your prerogative to maintain intellectual autonomy and assert your independence from the G-d of NOSTR ( me )
our friend nostr:npub1xy60n57p02ugl743zfag2ljftxh4s0ufpzu0wsmhdvng7hj5c0vqvx8w7v faces the same dilemma as you, namely he knows ( from many years of experience ) that i am always right, but at the same time he still needs to be his own person and therefore must occasionally find a point of disagreement with me, just like you do.
i try not to get mad because i want disciples, not slaves, and disciples should be able to have their own views, such that if i die you can take my place and not merely recite my teachings from a book like bible humping retards.
as Nietzsche said:
and there is a similar saying in Russian that goes "he is a bad soldier who doesn't want to be a General"
i WANT people to argue with me - it helps me stay sharp and helps them truly understand what i am saying instead of merely memorizing it - what i do not like is when they state their personal opinion that contradicts mine as if it was a fact, which is what you did regarding Klaus Schwab and WEF.
you basically just stated that i am wrong without any evidence, when it's something i have been looking at for decades and that is absolutely 100% consistent with all of the evidence and you likely barely even considered but then you make this completely unsubstantiated statement about how Tariffs are not driven by the desire of the WEF to deglobalize the world economy when i had actual mid-wits on speaker building forum understand my point yet it somehow went over your head.
i had literal morons whose job is to set up audio systems at rock concerts understand that international shipping is a major source of CO2 emissions and that Tariffs are a tool to lower that, and your response was "nah that's a CONSPEEEERACEEE theory"
like WTF ?
you should continue to think for yourself, even to the point of being contrarian on purpose but that should still involve THINKING and looking at evidence and so on and not merely making statements like " that's a CONSPEEERACEEEE theory ! "
i get it that you're such a huge conspiracy theorist and such a huge contrarian that you have come a full circle where you now support mainstream propaganda because negative X negative = positive ... and that's fine
but if you tell me that i am wrong i expect to see some reasoning / evidence especially when it is on a subject on which i know more than basically anybody ( which admittedly, is most subjects )
being a contrarian is good.
being intellectually lazy is not.