Replying to Avatar Laeserin

I won't be linking to any original sources in wiki pages, as I don't want to encourage people to edit or troll the content of sources. A source is simply a source, and should be shelf-stable. I don't need 15 variations of the same verse from the same version. They should all be the same, and then there's no point in wikifying them.

I'm going to put original texts into articles and create books out of the articles, and then link to the books or the articles.

But you can do it however you like. 🤷‍♀️
Avatar
🇵🇸 whoever loves Digit 1y ago

Also consider the benefit of being able to just add double square brackets to terms to link to the wiki pages for them for a wiki version of the bible

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Laeserin 1y ago

The wiki link would have to follow the Biblical standard notation, for that to help.

People who really care about Biblical/Quran/etc. content are fastidious about versioning and trusted sources.

Avatar
🇵🇸 whoever loves Digit 1y ago

I mean like, for Moses for example you could just add square brackets to his name and have it link to an article about him. And for old timey terms people need explained.

When there are entries with page names in biblical standard notation, that will of course be useful on another level