And they can walk on water also. By the way the Nazi narrative is false flag.
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=1029x1599&blurhash=%5EXJ8V1RPozWVWWof00s.WBWWfQay%7EqogWBWBjuj%5BM%7CayWBfkayfP%3FbV%40WBs%3BayWW-%3DR*V%40s%3Aj%40j%4001bHWBf5oLj%5B%25gWBj%5BfQfPkB%25MV%40ofoMa%7Dj%5B&x=7b69146181903c81b61f2f81d6aa659d8187f70e0a78da9dbd9d8b0e8180063b
and that is how camera angles are re-presentation, no photoshop required
It's not even worth the effort to explain. That's a textbook image template created by Russian agencies, probably the most used in online disinformation, the template is the same just the events are different.
Why should somebody who is photoshopping that image leave the ship in?
That's clearly the Guardian I would never ask anyone there for directions you would end exactly where you started because everything is far right....
Does "More than 100,000 protest across Germany over center-right AfD’s mass deportation meetings" make it more acceptable?
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=680x680&blurhash=UGM%40itj%5Boft700ayRjRj%7Eqoft7ay4nWBWBxu&x=6f034a3ba5e4b0ce2a1dc73d45994712c760c73f4db06159e2d5a8a42e62dc3f
I just assume everything they write is incorrect until proven otherwise.
They went from publishing the wikileaks cables(under the previous editor)to having articles openly sponsored by the Bill and Melinda Gates, Rockefeller foundation and George Soros's Open foundation.
Just look at the total B.S here:
Why would you assume anything they say is credible when they just print total crap like that?
Let me get into your reasoning, so you're denying that a specific event took place because I posted a screenshot from the Guardian? Lol
Is Reuters OK? If not let me know, I'm here for all the emotional support you may need
