I never listened to him, i aint trying go rewrite his positions at all, you made a claim that ive never heard justified and so i asked for specifics.

I said to igbore abortion bc its a highly devisive issue that is not going to be solvable bc one side is religious about it, im pro choice for govt policy, but still think those who get abortions are committing murder, but thats between them and their god.

From looking up what you mentioned, the civil rights thing, you seem to be misunderstanding his opinion, you can be against the federal govt enforcement of the civil rights act and still think blacks are equal. My spouse and 2 kids are black and i share that view, its not a right wing view, its a libertarian view against authoritarianism.

I dont see anything of him against womens rights, considering he had a wife and daughter, i find your claim to be doubtful, so if you have a specific example then im open to correction.

Theres 0 chance hes against religious freedom.

I bet your point about gay rights is based on marriage, which gets back to a states rights issue.

The trans rights issue I'd bet he was just against kids getting it, which is not an infringment of freedom. Unless your talking about the sports issue, which coulntradicts your womens rights issue.

Ill agree with you on the death penalty issue, the state should never be the arbiter of life or death of a human considering the rights of life liberty and property are the purpose of our founding documents. But for the other issues, unless you can site specifics, my understanding for the republican position on all of these is states rights. Which as an anarchist i see as a solid first step towards a weaker federal govt enabling more freedom.