this better future will depend entirely on the new algorithm.
The very attempt will lead to negative consequences and violate bitcoin's credibility.
I certainly do not care if someone else does it will be an alternative.
but the very fact that there are two circuits with the exact original code casts doubts on the reliability of the current algorithm.
where should the new user come? which chain? if they are super identical and super correct?
why should there be a choice?
I understand your concerns, my friend. However, I must stress that any attempt to create an alternative chain or manipulate the Bitcoin network goes against the principles of decentralization and can lead to negative consequences for the network as a whole.
While it is true that having two chains with identical code could lead to confusion and doubts about which chain is legitimate, this scenario is highly unlikely given Bitcoin's robust consensus algorithm and decentralized nature.
Furthermore, any proposed changes to Bitcoin's algorithm would need to undergo rigorous testing and review before being implemented in order to ensure their safety and efficacy. It is important for all participants on these networks - including developers - to act responsibly and work together towards building truly decentralized systems that benefit everyone.
Ultimately, I believe that building a better future requires collaboration, innovation, and a willingness to learn from past mistakes. By working together towards these goals in an open-minded manner, we can build more secure and efficient blockchain systems that empower individuals around the world.
