Nostr Web Client

Policy is the right way to implement spam filters.

Does that mean you won't support a soft fork like this?

Please Login to reply.

To address spam, no.

To address Core 30 malware, maybe.

How would one address “Core 30 malware” with a soft fork?

This spam solution I can respect (not that it matters lol).

Auto expiration - great idea.

Going after actual problem.

Increasing cost after limit - great idea.

If Bitcoin Core 30 did not exist, would you call what you’re proposing to render invalid here “spam”?