Discussion
Source? I see a massive error
What is your error?
I don't have an error, the map does
VT + NH do not have a high rate of gun crime. And they do have a high rate of gun ownership. there is no reason for them to be blue and lumped in with boston.
Looks like the map is just made up lies or poorly coded
Big if true
(I agree with the general sentiment, just surprised the divide is that extreme)
This is a crock of crap. Calling it. Prove me wrong and I'll zap you 50k sats
Igored
lies are lies, doesn't matter who's talking 🤙
97% is correct so it was not really a lie
Shit just NY, Chicago and LA make up most of that 97%
It might be a little off
But it is far from deseption
Guess I'll zap myself 🤩
The map is from the 2016 presidential election between Donald Trump and Hillary Rodham Clinton. The image was included in a story on the Medium website (archived here) and was used to illustrate the "Presidential winner by Congressional District." Lead Stories found it by doing a reverse image search on TinEye (archived here), an image search and recognition website.
The congressional districts marked blue voted for Clinton. The red ones voted for Trump. A screenshot of the map on Medium . com appears below:
Great job, that explains the small diffence in gun vilonce that we know happens in places like detroit.
The map its self is still pretty dam dead on.
No, it isn't. Dunno what your standard for dam ded onn is but if i ask for an apple and you give me an orange painted red it's not the same
If you look at this map .
It is dead on.
97% of the guns are in the RED
97% OF THE GUN VIOLENCE is in the blue
THE MAP ITS SELF DOES NOT MATER where it came from if the statement is true.
Here's the actual map
and i cite my sources (gives self back pat)
https://www.thetrace.org/2023/02/gun-violence-map-america-shootings/
https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/gun-deaths-by-state
