“Scorsese insists, as he has for years, that his films do not glorify violence, but express the fear he felt growing up on a Lower East Side ruled by Italian-American dynasties.” -from the article “Conversations with Martin Scorsese” 😂😂
That was how they lived, in prison or otherwise. So that’s what is shown. I’m not sure why you’re conflating glamorization with their lifestyle, which was decadent in many regards, but also completely reprehensible foundationally. I just watched this movie a month ago and it was very obvious that it’s the opposite of glamorized, it’s showing monsters. It is crystal clear in the movie that their lives are not enviable at all and they’re nothing more than low-bottom scum bags.
And obviously, yes, mobsters are interesting to most people. There have been countless movies and books about mobsters that have done very well in the mainstream. The market has proven that people are interested in mobsters.
The market finds mobsters interesting because while many dull people are also evil scumbags, their evil is juxtaposed with glamor, money, nice things. And I buy Scorcese’s rationale — it really does seem like he’s revealing a traumatic and paranoid world, and he does it well. I was just wondering the effect of being exposed to sensationalized and glamorized yet well made renditions of someone else’s trauma on me over several decades.
Thread collapsed