Medium. Some clients support markdown in these types of notes.

**yes**

_yes_

Not sure about underline though.

Unicode has bold and italics at least, idk about underline.

Derek Ross mentioned Markdown, but didn't mention that Markdown isn't in the nostr protocol spec, and Unicode has 2/3 of these features while being what the nostr protocol actually specifies to use. I don't even think Markdown has the other one, just the same 2/3.

Derek Ross also once gaslit me, wasted my time, and muted me for calling out his bullshit in the past, so I reply to you about his mention of Markdown instead of him because there's no point trying to teach him - he's not interested in learning, he just wants to reply without putting in the effort to know shit.

I thought Markdown in kind 1 was cool in the past too, but unlike Derek Ross, I'm capable of learning.

Instead of trying to jam Markdown into kind 1 notes and break the kind 1 spec that started without Markdown, it would have been better to avoid breaking the NIP-53 wiki spec by keeping Markdown in the NIP-53 spec that had begin with, but Derek Ross didn't back me up against fiatjaf's stupid idea to break the NIP-53 wikis with asciidoc, he ended up muting me over his own bullshit later instead so he could reply even later than that about off-spec Markdown offering the same features as on-spec Unicode in some clients but not all, completely ignoring Unicode and not being able to see it if I try replying to him.

𝐁𝐨𝐥𝐝 𝐔𝐧𝐢𝐜𝐨𝐝𝐞, 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐬𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐥𝐝 𝐰𝐨𝐫𝐤 𝐢𝐧 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐧𝐨𝐬𝐭𝐫-𝐬𝐩𝐞𝐜-𝐜𝐨𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐢𝐚𝐧𝐭 𝐜𝐥𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐨𝐫 𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐝

𝗕𝗼𝗹𝗱 𝗨𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗼𝗱𝗲, 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝗶𝗻 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗻𝗼𝘀𝘁𝗿-𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗰-𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝗰𝗹𝗶𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗼𝗿 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝗱

𝑩𝒐𝒍𝒅 𝑰𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒊𝒄 𝑼𝒏𝒊𝒄𝒐𝒅𝒆, 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒔𝒉𝒐𝒖𝒍𝒅 𝒘𝒐𝒓𝒌 𝒊𝒏 𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒚 𝒏𝒐𝒔𝒕𝒓-𝒔𝒑𝒆𝒄-𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒑𝒍𝒊𝒂𝒏𝒕 𝒄𝒍𝒊𝒆𝒏𝒕 𝒐𝒓 𝒇𝒓𝒐𝒏𝒕𝒆𝒏𝒅

𝘽𝙤𝙡𝙙 𝙄𝙩𝙖𝙡𝙞𝙘 𝙐𝙣𝙞𝙘𝙤𝙙𝙚, 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙨𝙝𝙤𝙪𝙡𝙙 𝙬𝙤𝙧𝙠 𝙞𝙣 𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙮 𝙣𝙤𝙨𝙩𝙧-𝙨𝙥𝙚𝙘-𝙘𝙤𝙢𝙥𝙡𝙞𝙖𝙣𝙩 𝙘𝙡𝙞𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙤𝙧 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙣𝙙

𝐼𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑖𝑐 𝑈𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑜𝑑𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑜

𝘐𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘤 𝘜𝘯𝘪𝘤𝘰𝘥𝘦 𝘵𝘰𝘰

none of this uses Markdown

NIP-53 needs Markdown, kind 1 doesn't