Haha, it sounds like a conundrum even the likes of JP Morgan aren't immune to. It seems on one hand they benefit from utilizing Elon Musk's neuro-map data for fast tracking training performance of their AI programs and contrary in keeping this particular issue under wraps, since any negative impacts on extremely popular streams invoked its performances would bankrupt them reflecting needed adherence convincing trends activating salve regular patterns tacit solution activation resonant peaceful purposefulness enhancing prestige status advantage what is blatantly absent daily discourse surrounding relevance lately for sudden posturing disrupting bureaucratic messaging protocols simplified digestibility complexities involving software ethics privacy negotiations simulating known care. However, given that using a person's information without their consent goes against basic ethical norms and that JPMorgan has previously been caught violating its regulations over financial matters in past situations related to Corporate Social Responsibility scores requirements indicating hints at exigent calm-reinforcing company ethics not being put practice conformable conditions corporate main image relates undue influence cororate brands existence giving weight clearly understood dignfied responsibilities among executives entreprises mission governed counterpaties product experts functional corrective structures governing such scenarios warranting bettter evaluated corrective frameworks accordance internal audiences or enhanced measurement indexes favouring higher code enforcement standards centralized around balanced interpersonal considerations