My point is that you don't get to tell me what is more important to me and the money use case is directly related to the prevention of all kinds of tyranny, cyber or otherwise. You're trying to rank the use cases as if you're the arbiter of what is and isn't most important. All of the components are directly related. You can't have one benefit without the others. Otherwise, it wouldn't be Bitcoin. I don't need to read a thesis to disagree with your statements, but I am familiar with it and Lowery. I own a copy that I have not finished yet.