Its not a problem of transaction fees, block size or network transfer. The primary issue is growth rate of the UTXO set which inscriptions and bitcoin stamps exacerbate. We need to focus on solving that for longterm Bitcoin benefit
Discussion
So they are creating too many UTXO'S too fast? If it continues we might need more computing power like running nodes over a GPU or something?
Why is that a problem?
i'm sure that there will be solutions found though... as it is, those blobs of data can be literally left out of a block without impacting the consensus, if i am not mistaken
putting hash sized stamps isn't going to cause a big problem, again probably just a matter of configuration options - if a UTXO can't be spent technically the U part is irrelevant, if you see what i'm saying, since it's unspent, but can't be spent
not sure if that is currently an issue in the sense that it's indexed, again, this is mainly implementation issues not something that really, long term, is going to impact the growth of the database or block storage
it's just a problem right now because the implementation doesn't quite reflect what the specification is
there is folk in the bitcoin dev community who are working on solutions
there is no doubt that the attack on bitcoin in 2017 caused damage, i think we'd still be at like 350Gb at this point without it