You are describing a paywall. Paywalls are not the way.
Discussion
Also why limit yourself to 1000 sats for a substack article when you could give it away for free and let people determine what itβs worth to them?
Imagine if there was a paywall for music π writing and music are different mediums and it's interesting to me people are ok with a paywall in the middle of an article, but imagine if that happened in the middle of a song.
Truefans is working an a model where if your not streaming sats you can listen to the audiobook.
This was first setup to be play to pay and not pay to play π
They need to paywall harder. I want to hear "insert more sats to continue" with a timer in the middle of my audiobooks, especially while driving.
So far, V4V is proving that the tip jar is not a viable model.
True, but I think each user should make that decision themselves. And I am fine paying the paywall meanwhile. :)
Paywall on it's own is not enough. We need to build an incentive system that encourages reposting of good content.
Most paywalls want you to subscribe for some amount of time, though, right? While what Vitor describes is a paywall, isn't it better that it is like a pay-per-view, rather than having to also pay for a bunch of content that you don't want? #asknostr
