That's actually part of the problem.

Imagine a roomba that can identify objects on the carpet, move them aside safely, and vacuum. We solved the "clean a blank carpet" problem decades ago. We spent the whole time struggling with "okay, now deal with objects and frictions."

I have a maid, not a roomba. The maid cleans every surface in the house. She's my vacuum, my solid floor scrubber, my counter cleaner, my stove cleaner, my bathroom cleaner, etc. She uses her intelligence to work around questions like, "should I move this, should I clean this, or leave it be?" When we travel and aren't at home, we can give her instructions on how to let herself in. She even brings the mail in for us to check when we get back. When she was hit by a truck and couldn't work for months, we paid her full wage during that time despite no work, as though she had benefits, since we valued her work so much.

Roombas have made very little progress at replicating any of that, to bring that capability from the upper-middle class and the upper class to everyone. When they start to do that (maybe not all of that, but the basics), then I'd pay attention.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

This brings up an important aspect of automation vs human labor: cost. In California we always paid a service to mow and blow the lawn, but in Sweden even well off people mostly do their own lawn care. Robot lawn mowers have really taken off in Sweden because labor costs are so high (mostly taxes tbh). I wonder if reducing imported illegal labor will not create more business for automation products. Even hiring a backhoe operator vs. team of day workers is a win for automation.

True, but it seems we are on the verge of making that breakthrough. Maybe that's the same kind of delusional thinking we've had for the past 80 years, that it's just around the corner, but it feels closer than ever before.