That’s a knownothing cop out. Please don’t vote then. That means a Biden’ supporter’s vote in your state will count double.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

To understand Bitcoin is , if you've gone deep enough, to understand that bankers rule the world either directly or through their networks of other private companies, eg pharma, military industrial.

Combine that with lobby laws in US and you either need the funding of these private networks who create fiat out of thin air or you need to be rich enough to fund it yourself.

The former means you owe the campaign funders once you get in and are bought and paid for eg Biden.

The later means you're somewhat more free but the last guy who wanted to change FED Reserve policy got his head blown off in broad daylight. More than enough incentive to keep a narcissist like Trump from going that direction.

Politics is a sham my friend which you've not yet seen through. Both candidates are arms of the same groups of "elites" being a network who controls each of them in the ways I've described but many others.

My comment was not based in some form of defeatist attitude but a lot of observation and reading.

The solutions we want and many need will not come from politicking. They want you and I to fight over Team A or Team B. The phrase divide and conquer is HIGHLY relevant here. You and I need to see through the haze and focus on the core problem as far as it can be seen. As Bitcoiners we should all unite against central banking and fractional reserve banking in general and take them out at the knees. They will not go away but they will be severely handicapped. We should be friends and bankers should be the object of our intense focus and our attempts to bring them into line.

#plebchain #nostr #bitcoin #centralbanks

Both candidates are not only arms of the same elite groups, they are also related to each other. All presidents of the USA are related to each other.

Not too much coincidence?

"I don't believe in coincidence" -Sherlock Holmes.

Holmes was a fictional character and that concept has been debunked. Many people with European backgrounds are related as they have been inter breading for thousands of years and can be traced back to have some sort of lineage together with others in a similar locale.

If you take a European or US American originally from Europe, you will not find this relationship to Charlemagne, as with all American presidents(even Obama). The elite remains among themselves. For hundreds of years. Their power no longer bears titles of nobility, but the elite circles are there and they will continue to exist.

Oh yes, Sherlock is a fiction. But I don’t believe either in coincidence.

Thanks for the thoughtful replies. I am not ready to believe that the world of elites is so well organized as you say.

Second, I want some things, like protection of my civil liberties. All countries are not created equal and I am not sanguine that simply opting out of one’s basic responsibility in a republic - voting for candidates who reflect one’s preferences - leads to more protection of my civil liberties. I think it leads to dictatorship, and I don’t want to live in one of those.

It's not about belief or a leap of faith, it's about reading 📚 . Two books which will help for you or anyone reading this are Whitney Webbs One Nation Under Blackmail and The Creature from Jekyll Island by G Edward Griffin.

The Elite networks and methods of control are laid bare in these.

Us believing in the vote takes the focus away from their networks. Exactly what they want. Less attention.

You aren’t really responding to my points, so good night. And please don’t vote, since you don’t believe in our system. That way, my vote counts twice.

I responded exactly to your points.

You are saying the same points over and over again. That means you're arguing from ideology primarily instead of knowledge. I say this not to convince you as you're clearly an ideologue but more to point out to the people who may see this thread the difference between arguing from a place of reading and understanding as opposed to making an egoic argument.