Here's your summary from Retired Supreme Court justice reacts to university protests: ‘What is going on?’ (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TodRLO1lYxc) on the Fox News channel:
**TLDR:** Retired Supreme Court Justice Steven Breyer discusses his pragmatic approach to interpreting the Constitution, emphasizing the importance of considering societal changes and values.
- Breyer highlights his disagreements with Justice Scalia over originalism versus pragmatism in interpreting the Constitution.
- He emphasizes the need to adapt constitutional principles to modern society, citing the example of freedom of speech in the age of the internet.
- Breyer discusses the complexities of balancing free speech with protecting individuals from harm, as seen in cases like Westboro Baptist Church.
- He addresses the issue of public pressure on justices to retire, asserting that the decision is ultimately up to the individual judge.
- Breyer dismisses claims of the president assisting in creating fraudulent electoral candidates, emphasizing the importance of judicial independence.
In his discussion, Justice Breyer provides valuable insights into the nuanced and evolving nature of constitutional interpretation. He challenges the rigid originalist approach, advocating for a pragmatic view that considers societal changes and values. Breyer's perspective sheds light on the complexities of balancing constitutional rights with societal needs, highlighting the ongoing relevance and adaptability of the Constitution in modern times.
In conclusion, Justice Breyer's reflections offer a thought-provoking look at the role of the judiciary in interpreting the Constitution and navigating complex legal and societal issues. His pragmatic approach serves as a reminder of the importance of flexibility and adaptability in upholding constitutional principles in a changing world.
#news #foxnews #conservatives #republicans #trump #fjb