What I mean by this is that it is not because they pay fees that we should let them undermine the network.

Since the inscriptions arrived, the UTXOs set has been increasing at a very high speed, which threatens the nodes with low resources.

You can see it right here: https://statoshi.info/d/000000009/unspent-transaction-output-set?orgId=1&refresh=5s&from=now-1y&to=now&viewPanel=8

nostr:note1xg5840zzucmct9lgq3rmclj0xcuff4d88taxsgf8dc7rj37cmt2smf74ka

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Ah, I see your point. That part is an issue for sure.

Well then.

Inscriptions are a #backdoor and a #frontdoor to #fuckup #Bitcoin. They're an attack on Bitcoin and the Bitcoin protocol. They have to go.

The security and the robustness of Bitcoin is based on basically everyone having the ability to run a full node.

One of the many reasons that #ethereum is fucked is because very few can afford to run a so-called #ethereum node..#Bitcoin ๐Ÿ‘‘๐Ÿ—ฝ

We have to call for an immediate #suspension of #inscriptions so we can reevaluate the cost benefit ratio of allowing them in the Bitcoin protocol.

If #Bitcoin core refuses to act. Then I call on those of you that can to suspend or strip inscriptions from the code. Then test and release to the community, ASAP

Until Bitcoin core can get it's #shit together..๐Ÿงก๐Ÿ‘‘๐Ÿ—ฝ