Yes, but even though the director intentionally made that scene to make psychopaths laugh, don’t you think the laughter is something abnormal, something that shouldn’t happen? Because in the place of the dwarf, it could have been anyone. In this case, I see the dwarf as Arthur in the first season when he killed the show host after being mocked. The director has done the same thing with the dwarf. They aren’t just fools—reality is just that painful, and abuse is inevitable. We continue to enjoy this painful reality, laughing ourselves into ecstasy.
Discussion
I haven't seen the film. Did you record it on your phone? Post the scene so I can laugh at it.
Oh wait, you're talking about the first film (that I also didn't watch LOL). OK, can't reach the lock, yeah that's kinda funny.
No the second!
No I didn’t! tell me when you watch the movie. There are still some people who, with or without talent, would want to appear on the altar of art. Perhaps, out of excessive desire and blindness, they would even accept being exploited. In fact, they wouldn’t even call it exploitation, but from a perspective like mine, it can be seen as such. That’s why I’ve always considered the consumption of certain works of art as a form of "exploitation" of the artists because most of them are so weak, and the world is so weak in what it serves today that any untalented individual is embraced. In reality, they are simply being abused.
