Replying to Avatar jb55

These seems like strongarming other clients to implement some spec they may not want to implement. Now we have broken images from a major nostr client. Are you implementing images this way #[5]​ ?
Avatar
Adam 2y ago

Agree, we need backwards compatibility until consensus is reached. Breaking functionality to force a change is not cool.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
jb55 2y ago

Normally it’s fine but this completely breaks a core feature in most clients (images). Doing this in a backwards incompatible way is just way too much. Good to hear he’s switching back to urls.