there are 2 things that puzzles me on this
1. currently their spending amount totals to $33mm, with $14 million on infrastructure and $19 million on staff cost - per year. But they only have 50 full time staffs. That either means each employees take home salary is $30k per month, which is really high, or there is a huge allocation going else.
2. This idea of "non-profit" - doesn't mean, its non-revenue generating business. You can generate very high revenue - but you have to expense out all your earnings/profits back into the business - hence zero-profit. Allbirds, Patagonia are B-Corps who are 100% public benefit company. I am not too sure what's the restriction Signal has in generating revenue.
I also think the focus hasn't been much on business strategy, business growth nor user adoption as it has been putting in engineering and R&D effort into creating stories, altcoin.
I think more business expansion focus is needed - ie like being able to transfer bitcoin/fiat through it would expand purpose and hence more users.
I might be wrong here, but I have always found Signal's budget allocation a little odd but i might be completely wrong. cc nostr:npub1wmr34t36fy03m8hvgl96zl3znndyzyaqhwmwdtshwmtkg03fetaqhjg240 as I saw this post through his repost, and nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m who is a major funder and would have better clarity