No, my point is a conversation, or debate is unproductive when terms aren't defined.
I want you to define Fascism, even if you're using a third parties definition then at the very least you could link your definition of Fascism by which source, or dictionary you're using.
You're the one that brought up the word "fascism" which I proceeded with as the word that it is in English.
If you're getting your definition from some source that isn't colloquial or the dictionary or wikipedia, idk what it is and it probably isn't worth engaging with.
My definition of Fascism would be that of an Authoritarian element that focuses on National Collectivism.
Or this article sufficiently describes my thoughts on Fascism as well, from the economic stand point.
Ok, idk what that means but if a dictionary or wikipedia or colloquial usage backs you up on that then America does it
To be fair to nostr:nprofile1qqsqc3wh630dkradmfppt5mv5rv6hgx8wxu96dchwe9c5y5dtezrungppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0zsazf0, I brought up fascism in my original post.
