Alright #[0] if I got your point rightly, it then seems accurate enough. A dynamic approach for variability avoidable measure being about 75% proactive and 25% reactive measures would indeed cut it fine substantially enough for proactive and compensational swat whenever risk elements resurface beyond projected points on proposal equations. Good thinking!

And on the lighter side of things:

How many tickles does it take to make an octopus laugh?

Ten-tickles! 😆