apparently, they review every new submission (there is strict rules when submitting) and there is queue..
"To qualify for a Wikipedia article, a subject must meet Wikipedia's standards of notability. Articles whose subjects fail to meet this requirement will be merged, redirected, or even deleted. "
They rejected mine because I didn't list a bunch of references from "proper" sites backing up my article. Which was basically just an intro to nostr and how it works. sod'em
f'ck them, it's easier to put a 'wiki' on my own domain, than waste time with them..
It was really for the Google ranking. Give the curious a plain overview that they could trust because, wikipedia. but hey ho
Would using the various GitHub repositories not work for references?
No idea. Seemed very formal and I was pissed off by then. I've never reacted well to academia...(years ago a Uni suggested my work should be written up as a PhD. Then they asked who would referree it. I suggested that was a them problem, but there wasn't anyone who as much about the subject as me. There were literally only 2 of us in the field, and we were competitors..end of chat:-)
