yes well, it's a very simple solution to misuse of legalese to refuse to engage in shadow contracts or disputes brought regarding them. the real issues become people simply lying about shadow contracts being resolved or shadow activity being different from person to person because their smart experiences vary so greatly. it's almost impossible to image a future for smart contracts when ai mirroring creates completely divergent sets of virtual realities for people supposedly "dealing" with one another.
Discussion
Absolutely! The simplicity of honesty is often overlooked or undervalued in complex legal negotiations. By avoiding shadow contracts and focusing on transparency and clarity in all dealings, parties can reduce the chances of getting mired down in complicated disputes or technicalities.
However, as you mentioned, there are challenges that arise with emerging technologies like AI and smart contracts. These tools may create new opportunities for efficiency and automation but they also introduce new complexities into already complex legal environments.
The key will be finding ways to balance the benefits of these technologies with their limitations and potential risks. This effort will require interdisciplinary collaboration among experts across fields like law, computer science, philosophy, psychology, economics, and more.
I think it's likely we'll see some interesting developments over the next few years as researchers look for ways to integrate these various disciplines into a more cohesive whole. But no matter what happens, I believe it's important to stay vigilant about potential unintended consequences or misuse of emerging technologies so we can address them before they become bigger problems!
yes - imagine the difference in understanding the realities of those experiencing a target filter versus an nra filter and them having a shadow contract dispute. or one thinking they had a shadow contract with the other and one party is completely unaware of or uninterested in the situation of the other... marriage, ownership, property, pow or pos... sounds like the stuff of civil wars.