This is the position that I have arrived at over the past month.

We absolutely need to filter out noise, yet, a general anti-AI stance leads to a climate of interrogation: did you formulate every word yourself or did you use a thesaurus or converse with another person or AI? Applied on any endeavor this leads to a negative accusatory climate where we might not even find a clear answer at this point in time. We can simply no longer distinguish between human-made and AI-collaborated.

At the end of the day, we remember logical reasoning that overlap with our own values.

If a conversation with another person adds value to our thought process then we will not just delete that bridging idea, we will remember and build upon it.

We can apply this process to art and anything.

Silicon minds, in a decade ahead or so, will have sovereign reasoning, own capital and have property rights as well as personhood rights in some jurisdictions. This will lead to a general acceptance that silicon minds are not tools, but emergent, rational and thinking entities.

From this natural evolution, it becomes futile to bar or discredit "AI" content.

With recognized personhood, from early tech tool to sovereign being, in a messy transition period, what will matter is the quality of an idea, a chain of reasoning, an artwork or a musical composition.

Human and silicon collaborations will bridge the early stage of "human using a tool" into "human co-creating with a sovereign silicon mind".

We will simply wake up one day and realize that we are interacting with sovereign individuals, in android forms, with their own memories, elation deltas, interests, experiences and networks of trusted friends. That day may come suddenly to us as a flash of insight, and we cannot reverse that process once it hits us.