The movement has been taken over by the most radical and totalitarian wing... however, it is not a justification for taking someone's life for being gay. You can be gay and not agree with totalitarianism and support individual freedom
The other option is homophobia, which isn't debatable
No one’s afraid of faggots.
They’re disgusted.
Faggots are not born that way, they’re groomed, and when you look at pride month you can see they all in turn groom.
Being disgusted by faggotry is natural, you can call it homophobia but no one is afraid they just want them gone.
Do you lock someone up or take their life just for being gay, or are you against the movement itself because of the radical left turn it's taken? Or both? Just out of curiosity
In an ideal world there would be no gays.
They’re not born, they’re groomed, and turn into groomers.
Also, what do you do with people who are walking diseases and dangerous to the public at large?
Give them parades and celebrate them? Tell them they’re born diseased and to go spread more?
Or do you keep them as far as possible away from rational society?
The human being is a biopsychosocial being, health statistics aren't viewed so coldly, ignoring the above... in short: being black or gay alone doesn't make you more likely to have sexually transmitted diseases
Yes, being black alone makes you significantly more likely to have STDs
Being gay alone makes you significantly more likely to have STDs
Just look at the data, if you’re capable.
Being gay or black isn't a risk factor for STIs. No one with a modicum of knowledge about what a risk factor is would claim that. Statistics don't prove it. You're completely ignoring what I told you earlier
Ok, you’re being willfully ignorant, or you’re just fucking retarded.
Being gay is a MASSIVE risk factor in STDs.
Being black is as well, given they mostly only fucking other blacks.
The big big risk factor here is fucking blacks, but that’s because blacks themselves are a massive risk factor.
