I also don't have to accept your changes to the design
Discussion
Oh you mean the configurable node setting that has always been tweakable according to the node runners preference? Ya no shit you don't have to use the same setting... This debate is insane
Yea that's the point, everyone can have their opinion, but what's truly best for the market will be decided by the market; and whining about it doesn't change anything. If ordinals are what the market wants, then they will get them. Personally I think they're retarded and are a fad that will die out once block space becomes more valuable.
No, that is absolutely not the point people are making. They are saying that a pool operator configuring their preferred MAX_OP_RETURN_RELAY value is somehow "an attack on Bitcoin". They are acting as if this setting is an ephemeral core parameter. It's literally designed to be and intended to be configurable.
Who is they? That was the point I was making, I think we've been shouting at each other in agreement 😅
I assumed when you said that you don't have to "accept my changes to the design" you were referring to Knots decision to include a different default value. As if altering an intentionally configurable value is "changing the design"