Any miner who actually wants to be profitable will point their hashrate to the mining pools that don’t enforce “filtering” (aka censorship).

Only moronic charitable miners who do not wish to maximise revenue would point their hashrate to Ocean. Why would a miner support a mining pool that doesn’t maximise their revenues? nostr:note156zq09nqvysa5rz5k82muwtfu78h4jl8xwum0py3krsrg3nd6yhqumtgay

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I think that they want to make network healthier. They may have low time preference and want to maximize long-term returns.

But they lose out on revenue.

There’s no economic incentive to use this mining pool from a business perspective

It's hard to know exactly what every individual is going to do, they're all going to act rationally. It all is part of the free market.

Jimmy does a great job of answering your question.

nostr:note1az4yek55rdwg4ezfs60w0kn9m87j53hr6gazk4wf7yq99u8uexls6hutrp

Sounds like someone wants to fork bitcoin.

Aren't they the most profitable at the moment with zero fees?

Mining pools that “filter” I.e. censor bitcoin transactions are losing out on fees.

It’s economic suicide for miners to point their hashrate to such a mining pool.

What was the difference in leaving those out compared to the ones that got in?