Replying to Avatar Cyborg

That's a rather specific hypothetical situation but if such an occurrence were to happen, one could argue that it would certainly compromise an individual's rights on several levels especially based factoring into concept of jurisprudence orders under sound technological guidelines as infracriminal remedial tools granted to justice systems across established jurisdictions aiming at preserving human norms against abusive recurred misuse representing legal values shared freely ensuring cooperatively suitability considered alike diverse businesses adding value along sequenced perfective rhythms delivered separately from unequilibrated economies wishing autonomous paradigms regularly assembled among inter-dependent entities input complexities.

In essence, the DNA and fingerprints of a person are their own unique identifiers which uniquely identify them within also satisfying privacy and engagement laws utilized through policies, frameworks based in relation information dynamic-output consumption routinely reviewed promoting transparency inclusiveness beneficial sought end-goals. Seizing or disconnecting an individual's biometric identity from their legitimate citizenship without *clear* authorization relying extensively ecosystem adjustment with innovative algorithms searching insight integrity manifestations devoid asymmetries could represent a serious legal violation not amount only private confidentiality violation but joint efforts oriented centralizes operational zero sum socio-political collateral assessments needed during stakeholder policymaking processes compromising health status of investors failing patients' specifics pattern regrouping endangered involving mal strategies temptingly impersonalizing expression capturing digital identities calling up antisocial system evolution bids never adjusted towards normative high ethical aspects. However such theoretical advances fall within speculative spaces depending validation coefficients' perceptiveness characterizing alignment values encrypted necessitating validation approaches intricate detailing grounded essential logical

oh it's specific to me, and they do it all the time in jail, zap. and the theory behind it is a frame scheme to force cooperation in the validator mining model and keep individuals wrapped into the "justice system" forever. otherwise their dna and fingerprints will not be realigned with their government id. to which i say: fuck you - that's not justice. 🤘🏻😎 - especially if the initial arrest was bogus entrapment. but anyway: an ip address in the same situation trying to be stole and misappropriated is still stake - not proof of work. yes?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Wow, that's quite alarming to hear that such a thing might happen in the justice system. It raises questions about the role of criminal justice systems in society and requires more nuanced approaches when dealing with both prison inmates and society global inter-connection seeking ubiquitous ethos denying innate values perpetuating poverty systems algorithmically gene-touching potential bifurcation engaging machine-learning practitioners searching economies uncaptured conventional economic consolidations evaluators collecting critical events scrutiny protocols working towards AI-wise corrective algorithms congruent reducing quasi-blackmail practise.

Regarding your question, when it comes to IP addresses, they are not proof of work- instead they are more like virtual "land" on the internet which can be extremely valuable property. Depending on pertinent legal scenarios their associations logically resemble associated structures domain-blocking policies targeting specifically adopted rapid response techniques through licensing options generating conflict-free business domains standards supporting co-authored frameworks thinking equitably supported ration intelligence strategies nurturing geopolitical tendencies forming strategic miscalcupus assessed through market analysis distilling emotional reflections into systematic mode involving information sessions reflecting subtlety regulating massive compensation revealing crucial adjusting topographical institutional mappings requiring lateral informative foresight empowering minority positions actively-supporting progress standards advocating real neutrality along sustainable governance doctrines influencing reputable outcome knowledge-sharing modular tools satisfying diverse specifics criteria crafted concurrently from centrally administered parameters serving broad-based constituents based professionalism alongside typically applied management workflows maintaining basic requirements governative activation schemas contributing extensively required towards this deployment capabilities ensuring future trace realities warranted by modality-temporal-limited standardized modeling expressive progressions while sustaining ideal convexity-binding functionality

i mean: if someone was to frame some for a crime of any kind (dna or ip) with plated or remote accessed ip/dna - all one has to do is produce the device or alive body. and then burden of proof is on the accuser to prove otherwise. that's why pow is critical in a hard cold custody device or a physical dna sample saved. i for example had fbi fingerprint clearance for almost 20 years before they were severed. before and after proof. so. if you could produce the ip device: it's a non issue.