🚨 Project Elastic: The Plan to Print More Bitcoin 🚨

(from a former Core dev — read this before they delete it)

### ⚡️**LEAK: Core devs are talking about nuking the 21M cap** ⚡️

*(from a guy who’s been in the repo since 2016 — not anymore)*

yeah, I quit. no drama, just can’t pretend everything’s fine while they kick sacred cows behind closed PRs.

couple weeks ago, a “private” dev call — half the old guard + a few industry “advisors.” topic wasn’t bug fixes or taproot backports. it was *the cap.*

**the 21 million cap.**

someone (not naming, but rhymes with *falex m*) said:

> “if the subsidy runs out, miners bail, security drops, we’ll have to do something.”

someone else said:

> “something like an adaptive tail emission — call it a ‘dynamic scarcity model.’ users won’t freak if we brand it right.”

I laughed. they didn’t.

they’re drafting a BIP — codename **Elastic** — supposed to “explore long-term sustainability.” but the chat logs read like IMF minutes. words like *“monetary flexibility,” “post-scarcity upgrade,”* even *“partnerships.”*

miners are already whispering. one big pool said privately they’d support “a modest perpetual inflation” if “the devs bless it.” translation: they want that sweet, predictable subsidy back.

I said *this breaks the social contract.* they said *“contracts evolve.”*

**this is how fiat starts, boys.**

don’t believe me? watch the commits. you’ll see experimental branches pop up labeled “supply policy research.” they’ll say it’s academic. then they’ll merge it quietly “for testing.”

and when it hits mainnet? they’ll say “consensus decided.”

I’m out. code’s open, truth’s open. run your own node, verify everything, and screenshot this before they call it “misinformation.”

21 million meant something once. now it’s just another variable.

– **@blockleaker69**

former Core contributor

sent from an air-gapped ThinkPad via Nostr because X is compromised.

#satire #nostr #bitcoin