Subnostr

#Lightning is a dead-end. I don’t know much about Ark. I’m not opposed to experimenting with different technical solutions as long as they don’t jeopardize the base chain which #drivechains don’t. The “drivechains enable shitcoins” argument is just irrational toxic #Bitcoin maxis talking point. Having drivechains on Bitcoin won’t degrade your experience with Bitcoin if you choose not to use them. If you can’t live with the idea that others may want to use a #drivechain then you think like a Bitcoin authoritarian.

Bill Cypher 1y ago

That is the wonder of bitcoin. Feel free to fork now and run a chain that supports drivechains. I won't run it. We both get exactly what we asked for.

Trying to make me support drivechains is authoritarian. Simply stating clearly that I won't doesn't make any attempt to control anyone else.

I've spent enough time around shitcoiners to see how losing hurts them. I don't want to play any role in giving the people trying to hurt them any new angle or help.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

LogicallyMinded 1y ago

I’m not forcing you to do/think anything. We’re just exchanging thoughts here. You’re free to participate in the exchange or not. #Drivechains don’t need a hard fork to be deployed, it can be deployed through a soft fork. You’re just confirming to me that the only argument against #drivechain is the non-consequential state, for those who don’t want to partake in it, of having other chains on #Bitcoin.