Proof of reserves is not "publish all your addresses" you dumb fuck spook

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Lol

I don’t like the idea he could be a lot of the selling pressure at the tops and buying pressure at the bottoms. Accumulating more Bitcoin than we know about because he’s possibly 1.5x’ing his stack regularly. Worse yet, maybe he doesn’t have it all because he’s lost it and all the investors get burnt when it gets exposed that the Bitcoin isn’t all there. I don’t know. Screw an ETF, screw a stable coin, screw MSTR, screw a wrapped Bitcoin (wBTC)…. BITCOIN ONLY.

“NOT YO KEYS………………………………..“

you know the rest.

I do. I hope he dumps the shit out of it and we never let him back in.

That would definitely be an upside. I dig it! 🤘

who’s we

The entire world except him.

too bad bitcoin is for everybody eh

Sure. Can't stop him, but I'd like him to pay 50x more.

Let's call it a shady douchebag penalty.

lol agreed

Saylor is overrated

Unless you want to use your Bitcoin as collateral, you don't need proof of reserve! And even in that case you are going to send your Bitcoin first to another address which then it is the proof!

Otherwise why I should proof something to someone else?

Is there a zero knowledge proof way to go about this?

Saylor's appeals to authority and exaggeration here is unsettling.

Bitcoin security experts would have a longer list why it's better to prove, and saylor can't keep saying he's institution he's legit.

This sucks lol he's definitely the patsy this cycle.

Absolutely, proof of reserves can be done with zero knowledge proofs. Saylor is not stupid, which means he is lying and spreading false nonsense on purpose.

Why though?

Who knows what motivates spooks, other than they're never up to anything good.