There’s a podcast clip somewhere that impacted my thinking on this, on living on bitcoin.

Basically - to the extent that one can, but MORE sats than otherwise planned and spend those sats. So you’ve got your stack (the dormant BTC) and you’ve got your cash flow that you spend.

And actually, and maybe to your point) an even more hardcore version of this is to spend only credit card fake money, and pay it off at the month using sats (or just fiat income and the sweep the remaining to sats)

Anyway, I’ll always agree that spending Lightning or ecash is a bit cumbersome while we wait for bitcoin to become the unit of account.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Could you share the link to the podcast episode?

Took me a bit but I found it

https://youtu.be/JaXJ2Zhd_Ww

The whole thing is useful as context if memory serves. But 23:30-24:01 was the most salient part in my memory

By 28:30 I think most of the idea has been said

Watched the first 28:10 just now. Will watch the rest too.

Comments: I am already doing exactly what Sahil explains, except that I don't trust a third party with my BTC (in his case, Level).

I pay for my daily stuff with fiat, just like Sahil does, mostly credit card and ALWAYS spending less than my income is, and I have some fixed monthly payments set on my fiat bank account by SEPA (like ACH). Just like Sahil does. And whatever is left after that, I stack sats with.

So the result is that every month my stack grows while I incur minimal fiat-holding risk.

Additionally, just like the host of the show, I do not trade BTC. In fact I can say that I have never, not once, sold one single sat. Never.

All this has little to do with what I was saying though, which is this constantly shilled idea that we have to pay for our daily expenses with sats. Which goes against the very idea of maximizing the growth of your stack.

First off, congratulations. This is the way :)

And you’re right. I got too excited that I found one of the relevant episodes and lost track of the fact that it wasn’t the precise one.

If a person is spending sats they would otherwise stack then I 100% agree with you.

But isn’t the idea you buy sats using USD you’d normally spend, and you use those sats for spending instead?

In that sense, it doesn’t impact sats stacking at all, it just helps to pressure bitcoin as a payment acceptance.

Sounds like you never zap then?

Thanks a lot Mate!