Well that is kind of vallee's point. The UFO appearing within different ages/different mindsets as ghosts, monster, fairies etc etc.

I've seen it described as a sort of blank, incomprehensible encounter or interruption, something from 'anorjer dimension'.which we do not have the faculties to reason. The blank is then filled with a familiar language eg ghost, or a futuristic, more secular language eg silver space age blob or plasma or whatever 'ufo'.

¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Would you count the transcendental argument for the existence of God as an observable argument? 🤔

Can't remember who described it like this, but it stuck with me. They described the traditional ghost in a white sheet as a sort of unrendered graphic of the brain. A 'default' type image that hasn't been filled in.

Not sure what I make of that but it seemed quite poetic lol

Wait I think it's the 'extradimensional hypothesis' as opposed to extraterrestrial. I think keel also uses this phrase, or something similar with spectrum. Which he proposes as potentially why there are often injuries associated with encounters, (burns and what not).

¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯